anti myd 88 Search Results


myd88 rabbit polyclonal ab  (Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd)
94
Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd myd88 rabbit polyclonal ab
Evaluation of the TLR2-TLR4 signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein <t>(MyD88),</t> phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.
Myd88 Rabbit Polyclonal Ab, supplied by Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+myd+88/Bovine+Myeloid+Differentiation+Primary+Response+Protein+Myd88/pmc11945018-214-43-51
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
myd88 rabbit polyclonal ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
anti myd 88  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
97
Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti myd 88
Evaluation of the TLR2-TLR4 signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein <t>(MyD88),</t> phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.
Anti Myd 88, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+myd+88/MyD88+Antibody/pmc10223675-169-27-29
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti myd 88 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
myd 88  (Proteintech)
93
Proteintech myd 88
Evaluation of the TLR2-TLR4 signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein <t>(MyD88),</t> phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.
Myd 88, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+myd+88/FITC+Anti-human+CD11b/pm41380855-71-2-4
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
myd 88 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
myd 88  (ImmunoWay Biotechnology Company)
90
ImmunoWay Biotechnology Company myd 88
Evaluation of the TLR2-TLR4 signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein <t>(MyD88),</t> phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.
Myd 88, supplied by ImmunoWay Biotechnology Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+myd+88/myd88+antibody/pm38905846-56-135-137
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
myd 88 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
smyd3 antibody 1088 alexa fluor« 488  (Novus Biologicals)
N/A
The SMYD3 Antibody 1088 Alexa Fluor« 488 from Novus Biologicals is a mouse monoclonal antibody to SMYD3 This antibody reacts with human The SMYD3 Antibody 1088 Alexa Fluor« 488 has been validated for the following
   Buy from Supplier
smyd3 antibody 1088 hrp  (Novus Biologicals)
N/A
The SMYD3 Antibody 1088 HRP from Novus Biologicals is a mouse monoclonal antibody to SMYD3 This antibody reacts with human The SMYD3 Antibody 1088 HRP has been validated for the following applications Western Blot Immunohistochemistry
   Buy from Supplier
myd88 antibody  (Novus Biologicals)
N/A
The MyD88 Antibody from Novus Biologicals is a mouse polyclonal antibody to MyD88 This antibody reacts with human The MyD88 Antibody has been validated for the following applications Western Blot
   Buy from Supplier
myd88 antibody  (biorbyt)
N/A
Rabbit polyclonal to MyD88 Isotype Note: IgG Host Note: Rabbit Conjugation Note: Unconjugated Reactivity Note: Human, Mouse, Rat Application Note: WB, IHC-P, P-ELISA
   Buy from Supplier
myd88 mouse monoclonal antibody  (OriGene)
N/A
MYD88 mouse monoclonal antibody clone OTI1A10 formerly 1A10 HRP conjugated
   Buy from Supplier
rabbit anti- myd88 polyclonal antibody  (Cusabio)
N/A
Rabbit anti-Human MYD88 Polyclonal Antibody
   Buy from Supplier
anti-myd88 antibody picoband  (Boster Bio)
N/A
Boster Bio Anti-MyD88 Antibody Picoband® catalog # A00025-2. Tested in WB applications. This antibody reacts with Mouse, Rat. The brand Picoband indicates this is a premium antibody that guarantees superior quality, high affinity, and strong
   Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Evaluation of the TLR2-TLR4 signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein (MyD88), phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.

Journal: Pharmaceuticals

Article Title: Sparstolonin B Suppresses Proliferation and Modulates Toll-like Receptor Signaling and Inflammatory Pathways in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells

doi: 10.3390/ph18030300

Figure Lengend Snippet: Evaluation of the TLR2-TLR4 signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein (MyD88), phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used were PCNA rabbit polyclonal ab (1:100 dilution, #bs-0754R, Bioss Antibodies Inc., Woburn, MA, USA), phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) rabbit polyclonal ab (1:200 dilution, #AF1015, Affinity Biosciences, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China), phospho-NF-kB rabbit polyclonal ab (1:200 dilution, #AF2006, Affinity Biosciences, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China), MyD88 rabbit polyclonal ab (1:100 dilution, # BT-AP05682, BT Lab, Shanghai, China), and cleaved-caspase 3 rabbit polyclonal ab (1:100 dilution, #9664S, Cell Signaling Tech., Danvers, MA, USA).

Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Fluorescence, Software, Control